F8#R#/}]O-0G1G)43)T&}E6_3CDV+A
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
F8#R#/}]O-0G1G)43)T&}E6_3CDV+A
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-04-29 06:33:41 UTC
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-29 06:42:36 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The author questions the use of B2 bombers for littoral bombing, suggesting that shelling with 16-inch rounds would be more cost-effective. They also inquire about the removal of deck guns from the USS Zumwalt, the absence of promised rail guns, and the lack of accountability among Navy Admirals.
Cost-effectiveness of military strategies
Technological advancements in naval weaponry
Cost-effectiveness of military strategies
Accountability within the Navy
Technological advancements in naval weaponry
Accountability within the Navy
High cost of using B2 bombers for littoral bombing
Removal of deck guns from the USS Zumwalt
High cost of using B2 bombers for littoral bombing
Lack of rail guns promised by the Navy
Removal of deck guns from the USS Zumwalt
Perceived lack of accountability among Navy Admirals
Lack of rail guns promised by the Navy
Perceived lack of accountability among Navy Admirals