<S+|(Q-A|>LMM4<K5%Z*P!=
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
<S+|(Q-A|>LMM4<K5%Z*P!=
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-01 11:10:31 UTC
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-01 11:10:47 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The author expresses concerns about the potential for manipulation and domination within the Community Notes system, suggesting that individuals may be incentivized to agree with incorrect information to maintain writing privileges. They highlight instances of inaccurate notes being approved and question the quality of contributions from those with high scores.
Potential manipulation of Community Notes by 'usual suspects'
Incentive to agree with incorrect information to maintain writing privileges
Concerns about the quality and accuracy of approved notes
Discrepancy between high scores and the quality of suggested notes
Maintaining objectivity and accuracy within Community Notes
Preventing manipulation by individuals or groups
Ensuring the quality and reliability of suggested notes
Balancing community consensus with factual correctness