E0<(V!'ZZE+!QI~>&67YMW%MN_#~
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
E0<(V!'ZZE+!QI~>&67YMW%MN_#~
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-04 07:40:31 UTC
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-04 07:40:49 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
A Beijing lawyer, Xiong Da, claims that appeal courts in China sometimes uphold incorrect first instance judgments due to internal quotas that limit the number of reversed decisions. He suggests that this system can lead to unjust outcomes, even in cases involving death sentences, and that reversing a judgment requires extensive approvals.
Potential for unjust outcomes in the Chinese legal system
Allegations of quotas limiting reversed judgments
Concerns about the handling of death penalty cases
Bureaucratic hurdles in the appeal process
Systemic pressure to maintain a low rate of reversed judgments
Potential for wrongful convictions to be upheld
Bureaucratic obstacles in correcting judicial errors
Lack of transparency in the appeal process