{*LRM|5Z~,]]R!.KBKC@7;9PVN:01&
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
{*LRM|5Z~,]]R!.KBKC@7;9PVN:01&
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-12 15:13:32 UTC
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-12 15:13:45 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
David's writeup discusses five key issues in distilled human judgment challenges on platforms like @PondGNN, inspired by Vitalik's concept of AI as the engine and humans as the steering wheel. The issues include recreating leaderboards, rewarding niche submissions, reducing gaming incentives, rewarding competition improvement, and running competitions without a central trusted party, ultimately aiming for a fully onchain DAO powered by AI and steered by humans.
Recreating leaderboards independently
Rewarding niche submissions
Reducing incentives to game the system
Rewarding improvements to the competition
Decentralizing competition management
Recreating leaderboards without organizer dependence
Rewarding models fitting niche data subsets
Preventing gaming of the system through multiple submissions
Incentivizing improvements to competition design
Achieving decentralized competition management