4A&KRW:4_|YB)K:;JB!L
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
4A&KRW:4_|YB)K:;JB!L
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-15 10:15:11 UTC

This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-15 10:24:55 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The author argues that the Obidient movement's belief that the Nigerian presidency could be negotiated on the streets was a critical error. They assert that political brokerage, not street activism, determines the outcome of presidential elections in Nigeria. The author uses Buhari's ascent to power as an example, highlighting the importance of political establishment support and the limitations of activism alone. The piece concludes that the only way to remove the current government is through a united opposition.
The Nigerian presidency is an outcome of political brokerage, not street activism.
Activism can be used but is not sufficient to upstage a sitting president.
Buhari's presidency was a result of negotiating power with the political establishment.
The Obidient movement's error was believing they could negotiate the presidency on the streets.
A united opposition is the only way to remove the current government.
Misunderstanding the dynamics of power acquisition in Nigeria.
Overestimating the impact of street activism on political outcomes.
The influence of a corrupt political establishment.
The control of INEC and security agencies by the ruling party.
Disunity within the opposition.