^*TF~ND_I-!Q1-(C5Y63]RWQ8V
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
^*TF~ND_I-!Q1-(C5Y63]RWQ8V
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-20 11:00:30 UTC
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-20 11:02:59 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
General Freire Gomes testified that Anderson Torres and Filipe Martins were not related to the document mistakenly called “minuta do golpe” (coup draft).
Drafts of state of defense or state of siege cannot be considered “coup attempts”.
It is lawful for any president to consider applying them, requesting studies to do so.
Conducting legal studies on constitutional norms can never constitute a crime.
It is an aberration to impute crimes to people who are not recognized as authors of the studies.
The effective application of constitutional norms cannot be considered a crime, much less the mere consideration of the application of norms that were not even applied.
In the case of such minutes, it is very clear that everything was just mere consideration, which could never constitute a crime.
It damages impartiality the judge who gets irritated with the mere witness during regular testimony.
Misinterpretation of constitutional powers.
Potential criminalization of legal studies.
Impartiality of the judge during testimony.