{=EEY4UMW4&~)0V<;?IG4{,^Q4YMCWZ{Z!8_;6?!VD'6,;D
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
{=EEY4UMW4&~)0V<;?IG4{,^Q4YMCWZ{Z!8_;6?!VD'6,;D
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-05-31 01:58:43 UTC
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-05-31 01:59:21 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The text criticizes a person for giving an emotional speech at Harvard, questioning whether it was approved by the Chinese Communist Party's Propaganda Department. It also criticizes China's Hukou system and the disparity between Beijing and the surrounding Hebei province, suggesting the speaker should advocate for abolishing the Hukou system and the pension dual-track system in China instead of promoting a 'community of common destiny for mankind'.
Criticism of emotional speech at Harvard.
Critique of China's Hukou system and its impact on equality.
Disparity between Beijing and Hebei province.
Call for abolishing Hukou and pension dual-track systems in China.
Inequality caused by the Hukou system.
Disparity between Beijing and the surrounding Hebei province.
Restrictions on freedom of speech in China.
The existence of a 'poverty belt around the capital'.