!G~RR~#?6@<.%O1Z#A3/}9M3!I*H,&(~U1[K.LX
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
!G~RR~#?6@<.%O1Z#A3/}9M3!I*H,&(~U1[K.LX
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-06-05 16:21:50 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The author advocates for keeping EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill while removing the 'MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK,' arguing for a 'slim and beautiful' bill over a 'big and ugly' one.
EV/solar incentive cuts
Elimination of excessive spending ('DISGUSTING PORK')
Preference for a streamlined bill
Unfair treatment of oil & gas subsidies compared to EV/solar incentives
Excessive and unnecessary spending in the bill
Achieving a balanced and efficient legislative outcome