$.V?S,3M/S7RT}C|&~B:7DUGCJLMWP
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
$.V?S,3M/S7RT}C|&~B:7DUGCJLMWP
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-06-29 12:05:29 UTC
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-06-29 12:05:55 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
Nicholas Kristof argues in the New York Times that a diplomatic approach, backed by military strength, is more effective than military action alone in addressing Iran's nuclear ambitions and promoting lasting change.
Diplomacy combined with military strength is more effective than military action alone.
This approach can contain Iran's nuclear aspirations.
It can also deliver lasting change in the country.
The diplomatic toolbox, reinforced by military might, is profoundly flawed.