_Q0$P|:V8Q^/G|%)K;H=]M@E3BGM;{&>#F
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
_Q0$P|:V8Q^/G|%)K;H=]M@E3BGM;{&>#F
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-04-13 17:53:34 UTC
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-13 17:56:06 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
A study reveals that scholars accused of sexual misconduct experience a decrease in citation rates following public allegations, while those accused of scientific misconduct do not face a similar decline.
Public allegations of sexual misconduct impact scholars' citation rates.
Scholars accused of scientific misconduct do not experience the same citation penalty.
The study highlights a disparity in how different types of misconduct affect academic reputation.
Measuring the impact of misconduct allegations on academic reputation.
Distinguishing the effects of different types of misconduct.
Determining the long-term consequences of misconduct allegations.