?ZG7O~;-5LEKD_NA8:H9?N^QO!'%8I
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
?ZG7O~;-5LEKD_NA8:H9?N^QO!'%8I
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-04-15 12:51:41 UTC
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-15 12:52:05 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The author argues against the current U.S. position on the Iran nuclear deal, claiming it's a collapse and no better than the Obama-Biden deal. They assert that tolerating Iran's enrichment and leaving key facilities intact allows them to escalate at any time. The author believes Iran must be forced to eliminate its fuel, weaponization, and missile capabilities through military threat and economic pressure.
Critique of the U.S. position on the Iran nuclear deal
Dangers of tolerating Iran's enrichment capabilities
Necessity of eliminating Iran's fuel, weaponization, and missile capabilities
Call for military threat and economic pressure to force Iran's compliance
Iran's potential to escalate its enrichment capabilities
Difficulty in verifying Iran's compliance with inspections
Hiding weaponization and missile-delivery work
The threat of Iran resuming its nuclear path