GWG},0EJ,OSWJI;OM92},Y3U5E1$JBI[#_}T
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
GWG},0EJ,OSWJI;OM92},Y3U5E1$JBI[#_}T
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
This article contains some claims that are falsified. While not everything in the article is false, please proceed with extreme caution and verify any critical information independently.
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-17 14:38:15 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
The DaTong engagement case involves a mother-prosecutor-lawyer who allegedly used double standards by claiming that a complete hymen does not prove the absence of rape, while using mixed genes on a bedsheet as evidence of rape. The evidence favorable to the man was excluded, and a guilty presumption was made against him. The woman's family allegedly extorted and threatened the man for property, but the mother-prosecutor-lawyer used the man's "uh-huh" as evidence of admitting rape. The article questions the differential treatment and exclusion of evidence unfavorable to the woman.
Double standards in evidence interpretation
Guilty presumption against the man
Exclusion of favorable evidence
Alleged extortion and threats by the woman's family
Differential treatment of evidence
Bias in legal proceedings
Misinterpretation of evidence