ANOCA vs Obstructive CAD: A Comparative Analysis
Posted: 2025-04-24 04:48:54 UTC
Safe To Read
We use a score to evaluate content reliability. This article's score is high enough, and there are no largely false claims identified in this rollup.
Full Thread
Safe To Read
We use a score to evaluate content reliability. This article's score is high enough, and there are no largely false claims identified in this rollup.
Verification Details
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-24 04:50:56 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
TL;DR;
A study comparing Angina with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA) and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) regarding clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes before and after angiography.
Key Impact Areas
ANOCA patients have indistinguishable chest pain characteristics and similar positive myocardial ischaemia results compared to Obstructive CAD.
There is minimal difference in patient-reported outcomes at 12 months between ANOCA and Obstructive CAD.
ANOCA patients have lower rates of ICD-10 Cardiac Dx, anti-anginal Rx, all-cause mortality, MI, and chest pain admission compared to Obstructive CAD.
Challenges
Diagnosing and managing chest pain in patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries.
Achieving similar patient-reported outcomes in ANOCA and Obstructive CAD.