A2.{}6(.B!R0#%T*|Y'[
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
A2.{}6(.B!R0#%T*|Y'[
SYSTEM PROCESSING...
Posted: 2025-04-24 04:51:30 UTC
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
This article contains some claims that remain unverified. While much of the content may be accurate, exercise care when relying on this information.
Status
Last Updated
2025-04-24 04:54:05 UTC
Verified By
Rollup News
A mixed-method study comparing the environmental impact of telemonitoring versus on-site cardiac follow-up in a Dutch academic hospital, highlighting the carbon footprint and resource use of each approach.
Environmental impact of healthcare
Telemonitoring vs. on-site cardiac follow-up
Carbon footprint comparison
Resource use analysis
Sustainability in healthcare
Higher carbon footprint of on-site care (+480% global warming)
Increased mineral/metal resource use for on-site care (+4390%)
Balancing patient health with environmental sustainability